In a super-secret location in Tel-Aviv, we are working on an experiment that may change your social life. One room, one folding table, 4 laptops, a couple of vintage radios in the background and one really cool concept.
More info soon.

In a super-secret location in Tel-Aviv, we are working on an experiment that may change your social life. One room, one folding table, 4 laptops, a couple of vintage radios in the background and one really cool concept.
More info soon.

Ok, this is super geeky, but too good to go unnoticed.
I landed in Israel a couple of days ago and discovered Orange Israel is out-of-stock on sim cards for iPhone 4.
I was given a temporary phone to use in the meanwhile.

No touch screen (judging by the scratches, it’s more of a scratch screen), no Internet, no facebook, no Twitter, no web browsing, horrible interface. I tried sending an SMS earlier and couldn’t figure out how to type with such a strange keyboard.
How did all these ancient people who lived in the early 2000s get through life with such primitive means of communication?

(Above: Phone Used by Alexander the Great.)
So, I need to learn to be careful of what I wish for:

I became a hotspot hunter, using my iPhone as a contact manager, and whenever there is wifi around, I breath deeply and connect to see what’s new out there in the inter-webs.
In fact, the only thing my Nokia does is initiating and receiving phone calls. And it does it quite well actually: good call quality, good volume and no dropped calls.
I think I’ll miss it once I get back to my iPhone.

Google Translate’s translation:

If I would only know what are Ppak and badaldago, I could find the right response.
I passed by Barnes & Nobles in Union Square a couple of days ago and had a strange, counter-intuitive, feeling: I was jealous of people without Kindles. They actually had a reason to go into what used to be one of my favorites stores. As for me, I reluctantly realized I haven’t been in a book store for over 6 months.
I have been bearish about the book industry for years, although I haven’t written much about it. So, let me say that loud and clear: The book eco-system is in a state equivalent to a dead tree: it is still standing in the forest, and from the outside all seems ok, yet one day, without any pre-warning, it tumbles over and falls into the ground.
And the industry is being killed by a special kind of book: the digital one.
Amazon’s Kindle was the first reading device to become mainstream, with numerous titles and an easy one-click purchase process. It made buying digital book a sweet instant experience. It is now their top selling product ever, as is Barnes and Noble’s recent entry to the e-reader market, the Nook.
So, who is getting killed and why?
First and foremost, the book stores.
I also noticed a change in my behavior: I used to buy more books than I could read, as I was overly eager in the bookstore. I had stacks of books next to my bed (I called is my guilt stack). Not anymore. As I can now buy any book I want, whenever I want, I simply buy less. I know the book will be there, waiting for me in Amazon’s repository, and there is no rush in buying it. I think my book purchases are down by almost 50%.
Update:
It has been a few days since I wrote this post (it was waiting in my queue for some fine-tuning), and I read the grim news of America’s 2nd largest bookseller Border’s cash crisis. It’s sales in Q3 fell nearly 18% from a year earlier, and it lost $74M dollars last quarter.
(End of update)
Border’s stock lost about 95% of it’s value in the last five years.

Barnes & Nobles is trading at $14.15/share, similar to its 1993 IPO price, down a 65% from it’s price 5 years ago, and the market expects it to fall much further, with short-sellers consisting a whopping 49.4% of float.

And if at stock prices we are, the following chart shows how a little online bookseller from the nineties, called Amazon, has been doing compared to the the above two old-school playesr: a 10,000% increase in value. Wow. Again: a 10,000% increase in value. If I only invested my 1997 savings of $15,000 in Amazon’s stock, I could have been flying business class now, sipping champagne with all the bankers.

Back to the eco-system:
Second come the publishers. The publishers have an important role in the eco-system: the filter manuscripts, employ editors who work with authors on improving authors books, and most important: they are marketing machines. Strong publishers have better placement in bookstores (a critical element for marketing new books) have more marketing dollars and have a better chance of creating a buzz for the books they select to promote. The problem: only a couple of authors get the royal publisher treatment (usually based on their revenue potential and previous success). The rest are left to promote their books pretty much on their own. In a digital world, the publishers strongest asset – it’s relationship with the bookstores – isn’t needed anymore. So why would a successful author need to share his revenues with a publisher? He can self-publish his book digitally and keep a significantly larger chunk of the revenues.
My prediction: most publishers will go out of business within the next 5-10 years.
Some statistics:
There are six large publishers in New York, 3-400 medium-size publishers, 86,000 small self/publishers. The large six publishers revenues accounted for 45% of the ~ $40B industry (in the US).
A publisher must sell about 10,000 books to break even. The average book sells 500 copies.
Book authors.
The vast majority of book authors do not make a living of writing books anyhow. Unless they live with their parents, book writing should be considered as their hobby. These authors are actually going to benefit from the rise of the e-book market, as they don’t need to shop for publishers and can distribute their books without paying high printing cost or fight for shelf placement.My prediction is that the revenues of professional authors will decrease significantly without the publishers marketing machines and premium bookstore placements. However, their profits may not be as adversely affected once they cut the middle man (i.e., the publishers).
Book editors will have a hard time making a living. As their pay checks are received from the publishers, lower publisher revenues will yield in lower pay for editors, down to a point where they will have to switch an industry. This will of course have a direct averse impact on book quality.
The biggest threat to the authors is content theft. Today, e-readers are making a good job with their DRM (digital rights management that prevents illegal copying of digital content), but books are already being ripped and republished as DRM-free PDFs. It’s going to be a fierce battle, and we all know who is going to win. Unlike music bands though, which sell less albums yet can still make a living from live performances, authors don’t have this luxury: seeing a book author live on stage is somehow less exciting as watching U2 performing in front of a full stadium.
Readers.
With authors less incentivized monetarily to write books, we’ll have a smaller selection of good new books. I am now reading Andrew Sorkin‘s Too Big to Fail, and cannot imagine him doing such an extraordinary research and writing work as a non-profit. After all, one has to pay the monthly bills.
There is much more to write about the book eco-system, but this post is getting to be too long. If you read so far, I’m impressed!
Finally, a short list of book qualities the e-reader can’t replace:
1. The smell of an old book and the fun of reading of its yellowish pages.
2. The beautiful covers of some books.
3. The excitement of having all your books lined up like solders in your library.
4. They are less fragile. I dropped my Kindle by mistake last month in Puerto Rico, and my heart lost a bit. If it would have broken, I would be stuck without anything to read. Books don’t break.
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
[Update Jan 3, 2011]
Just came across this post that has some interesting statistics: Amazon sells 6 Kindle books for every 10 physical books; sales of Kindle books already surpassed sales of Hardcover books; for it’s top 10 best-selling books, it sells 2 e-books for each physical book.
A friend showed this to me earlier today. I did some (= 15 seconds) research, and it seems as if it was written in 1994, source unknown. If anyone knows the source, feel free adding it in the comments.
As I am half way reading through “Too Big to Fail”, point #1 and #2 seem more relevant than ever.
Here’s how to keep all that political “news” in perspective:
1. The Wall Street Journal is read by the people who run the country.
2. The Washington Post is read by people who think they run the country.
3. The New York Times is read by people who think they should run the country and who are very good at crossword puzzles.
4. USA Today is read by people who think they ought to run the country but don’t really understand The New York Times. They do, however, like their statistics shown in pie charts.
5. The Los Angeles Times is read by people who wouldn’t mind running the country, if they could find the time — and if they didn’t have to leave Southern California to do it.
6. The Boston Globe is read by people whose parents used to run the country and did a poor job of it, thank you very much.
7. The New York Daily News is read by people who aren’t too sure who’s running the country and don’t really care as long as they can get a seat on the train.
8. The New York Post is read by people who don’t care who is running the country as long as they do something really scandalous, preferably while intoxicated.
9. The Miami Herald is read by people who are running another country, but need the baseball scores.
10. The San Francisco Chronicle is read by people who aren’t sure if there is a country or that anyone is running it; but if so, they oppose all that the leaders stand for. There are occasional exceptions if the leaders are handicapped, minority, feminist, or atheist dwarfs who also happen to be illegal aliens from any other country or galaxy, provided of course, that they are not Republicans.
11. The National Enquirer is read by people trapped in line at the grocery store.
12. The Seattle Times is read by people who have recently caught a fish and need something to wrap it in.
The short answer is yes. The longer answer is: depends how you look at it.
There has been a lot of discussion recently of the insanely high valuations of web startups. It’s an entrepreneurs market again, with Venture Capital firms fiercely competing for deals. They often do so by offering ever-higher valuations for companies with little or no revenues, and at least in some cases, without even a clear path to revenues.
Are many of these young companies highly overvalued? you bet they are. From a startup valuation perspective, the bubble is definitely out there. These startups will have to reach significant revenues to exceed these valuations in their next round of financing or get acquired for a descent amount. As the bar is set so high by current valuations, most startups will probably fail to deliver.
But why isn’t that a real bubble? The answer is pretty simple: most of these crazy valuations and cash infusions are given to private companies by other private companies.
During the happy days of 1999, almost everyone with a brokerage account took part in the party, investing like wackos in companies with horrible business models and broken fundamentals. When these companies ran out of money, the stock market crashed and the whole world took a hit. The hangover was painful and lasted for year.
Nowadays however, IPOs are far, far away for startup companies. Unlike 1999, you need to have a real business, with real revenues, and I would even boldly mention a non-startup-friendly term called profits.
So who is going to pay the price for this bubble?
First and foremost – founders and employees. If these companies will be forced to raise capital at a lower valuation than their previous round of financing – founders and employees will be heavily diluted. Same goes if their startup gets acquired for a valuation lower than the last round of financing. VCs put various protection mechanisms in each financing round, and are the first ones to take money off the table (usually, with a 2x-3x multiple). In many cases, little will be left for the people who devoted years of their lives to the company.
Second in line are the VCs. Even if a company is still private, down rounds are written in VC books as losses. No one wants to show too many loses when he tries to raise money for his next fund. Personally, VC partners will also experience a financial disappointment if their fund can’t show nice returns. The management fees are pretty generous, but the real personal home run for partners is the 20% share of their investors profit.
Then, you have the suckers. Big companies (Yahoo, anyone?) that buy hot startups for crazy valuations that cannot be justified economically (eBay buying Skype for ~$4B, AOL buying Bebo for $800M only to sell it for $10M a year later). For some reason, it seems that most of these crazy acquisitions take place in California, where medicinal weed is legal.
Finally, us. Many of our pension funds are diversifying their portfolios by investing in Venture Capital. Losses for venture capital firms will represent a loss to our personal pensions. However, as the allocation to the venture capital class is relatively small (and keeps decreasing as the venture capital asset loses its positive sentiment), its direct effect on ua will be minimal.
So, from a personal finance perspective, there is no real bubble. It’s really just a redistribution of wealth: The pension funds invest our pension money in VCs, who keep 20% and invest the rest in startups, who in turn offer higher salaries to young, talented engineers, who can now drink higher quality liquor on Friday nights. I bet the average income per shift of a waitress in Silicon Valley went up at least 20% in the previous 12 months.
Nevertheless, the price we will pay as a society may be harsh: We need startups to create innovative products and technologies that will make out lives better. The startup eco-system is critical not only for the stock-options-hungry engineers from Silicon Valley, but for our everyday lives. Startups are a critical part of the evolution process that optimizes and improves the world we live in and we must make sure the people who supply the fuel to these innovation labs (i.e., the VCs), act reasonably enough as a group to allow the eco-system to thrive.
My recent post re Spinal Tap reminded me of director Rob Reiner, which did some great movies my twenty-somthing friends never heard of. Here’s a quick recap of his most notable films (sorted in descending order of greatness):
Princess Bride (1987)
Of of the best love stories ever. Made a whole generation fall desperately in love with Robin Wright. Great set pieces, unforgettable characters, and one-and-only Inigo montoya.

Stand By Me (1986)
One of the best coming-of-age films ever made. River Phoenix and three of his friends are set on a journey to find the body of a missing teenager. Great, touching, story with unforgettable scenes. If you watched it as a kid, you would forever be worried of leeches when he you cross a river, and the the train track scene would haunt you for years.

Family Guy’s homage to the train track scene:
Misery (1990)
A great adaptation of Stephen King’s suspense novel, you would not want to spend alone time with Kathy Bates after watch the film.

This is Spinal Tap (1984)
This movie wouldn’t be appreciated by everyone, but it well deserves its cult stature. a fake documentary of a non-existing heavy metal bands dives deep into all the cliches of the industry. Check out my previous post for the hilarious ’11′ scene.

A Few Good Men (1992)
Great court drama on morals and camaraderie within the US Navy. Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Demi Moore. Based on a play by Aaron Sorkin (the same guy who wrote The Social Network, which happens to be a movie on… morals and camaraderie)

When Harry Met Sally (1989)
This movie deserves its place in history thanks to the best fake orgasm scene ever. It made a lot of noise (literally) in the puritan 80s. Meg Ryan at her best.

This post is brought to you thanks to Google’s free in-flight WiFi holiday special.
IMDB is playing a great practical joke on Spinal Tap’s epic ’11′ set piece.
(via ProstheticKnowledge).
For those of you who missed it:
(which reminds of another cult fiction rock bank, the Leningrad Cowboys)